International Patents Pending

The EvacLite Running Man Logo and Three Arrow Array are registered Trademarks of EvacLite under No 2519260

This website is being updated shortly with the new ISO EN 7010 Standard sign options.

Getaway logo British Flag

TM

Dynamic Emergency

Evacuation Signage

Developed

in the UK

3hi-res untitled

EvacLite Ltd

Newhaven Enterprise Centre

Denton Island

Newhaven

East Sussex

BN9 9BA

United Kingdom

 

Tel: +44(0)1273 61 50 51

 

EvacLite Ltd is registered in the United Kingdom: GB06833103

 

VAT No: GB 927 707 304

 

EvacLite and the three arrow array are registered ® Trademarks.

EvacLite Dynamic signage is proprietary technology & and protected by International Patents Pending.

 

Supported by the UK Trade and Investment.

arrow1 arrow2 Arrow3S 3hi-res

© EvacLite Ltd, 2015

All Rights Reserved.

®

ukti logo

®

White Papers/Trials

STATIC/PASSIVE

FIRE EXIT SIGNAGE EXPERIMENT 2009

Page currently being updated..please bear with us.

View PDF of full results Exit right passive sign

Individual participants were asked to navigate their way around the selected building interior until they reach a defined exit.  Participants were free to select their own route through the building and proceeded until the end point was reached or a member of staff indicated the trial had ended.

 

Participants were equipped with head gear fitted with a video recording device that effectively recorded what they saw.  The actions and behaviour of the participants were also recorded by video cameras located at fixed points throughout the building.

 

At the end of the trials, participants were requested to complete a questionnaire and participate in a one-to-one interview. Paper provided courtesy of the Fire Safety Engineering Group - University of Greenwich

wearing_head_gear_etc

Summary of trial:

 

While on average only 38% of people unfamiliar with a building layout are likely to detect regulatory standard signs, on average 97% of people are likely to follow the guidance provided by signs once they are detected. These results also suggest that current emergency guidance signs are less effective as an aid to wayfinding than they potentially can be.

If they can be made to be more obvious while maintaining the simplicity and strength of the guidance information they provide, they are likely to become very effective due to high acceptance of signage information.

To address this problem it is necessary to increase the affordance of the sign. This can be done in a number of ways such as increasing the size of the sign, making the sign standout more from the background, or introducing addition sensory stimuli such as flashing lights and auditory signals. However, it is essential that the simplicity and strength of the information conveyed by the sign is not decreased through enhancing the affordance of the sign.

Bicycle helmet - lab trials

Video camera equipment used in trial

DYNAMIC SIGNAGE SYSTEM (DSS)

FIRE EXIT SIGNAGE EXPERIMENT 2012

View PDF of full results EvacLite Dynamic Sign - Part 1 - Right EvacLite Dynamic Sign - Part 2 - Right evaclite_dynamibA9ce

 

Summary of trial:

 

The results obtained from the this trial showed that the Dynamic Signage System (DSS) achieved at detection rate of 77% when participants directly approached the sign (i,e. approach angle perpendicular to the surface of the sign) and 72% when approached at an angle (i.e. approach path tangent to the surface of the sign) . Under the same experimental conditions as decribed in trial one above (passive), static signs produced detection rates of 38% and 37% respectively.

This is an important result as it suggest that the dynamic sign can achieve a significantly high detection rate from a variety of angles.

lab trials dss

The difference in the detection rates achieved by the DSS compared with the conventional static (passive) signage system is statistically significant.

 

The high signage detection and compliance rates were also supported by the result of the post-trial interviews. A significant majority of the participants ( 80 to 90% ) confirmed that the flashing lights assisted them in making a quick route decision and reinforced this decision, while the flashing light did not cause confusion and hesitation to them. 

Passive trials 2009 conducted by the Fire Safety Engineering Group (FSEG), headed by Professor Ed Galea, at the University of Greenwich.

 

Dynamic Trial 2012 conducted by the FSEG as part of the the EU funded Getaway project.

 

Dynamic Trial 2013 held at the St Cugat Railway Station in Barcelona.

 

Dynamic Trial 2014 held at the St Cugat Railway Station in Barcelona.

new_fseg_logo

 

PASSIVE & DYNAMIC VIDEO SAMPLES

FIRE EXIT SIGNAGE EXPERIMENT

The specific purpose of this experiment as detailed above, was to determine the likelihood that building occupants involved in an evacuation situation and faced with a route decision point and who are located within the Visability Catchment Area (VCA) of an emergency sign will perceive the sign, correctly interpret its information and correctly act upon the information.

 

68 test subjects took part in the trial. Video footage recorded by head mounted camera was used to not only measure the decision time

but also to identify different behaviours during the decision period. Unfamiliar participants who fail to detect the sign require on average 5.6 seconds to decide which direction to take at the decision point.

 

The emergency escape route sign shows that evacuees should go left at the junction.

 

62% of the test subjects did not see the sign.

 

Experimental analysis of the effectiveness of           emergency signage and its implementation in         evacuation simulation.

The specific purpose of this experiment was to replicate the experiment above but with the Evaclite Dynamic Signs to determine the likelihood that naïve building occupants involved in an evacuation and faced with route alternatives who are located within the VCA of a dynamic emergency sign (i.e.have the opportunity of perceiving the sign), correctly interpret its information and correctly act upon the information. We then evaluate the level of improvement in detectability of the new dynamic sign compared with the conventional static sign. 58 test subjects took part in the trial.

 

Unfamiliar participants who detected the sign required on average 1.8 seconds to decide which direction to take at the decision point.

 

The dynamic emergency escape route sign shows that evacuees should go left at the junction.

 

77% of the test subjects did see the sign.

The decision time was three times faster.

 

 

 

 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

Project GETAWAY (contract 265717) was funded under the European Union Framework 7 Transport initiative. The authors acknowledge the co-operation of their project partners: BMT Belgium, Vision Semantics Ltd UK, London Underground Ltd UK, Evaclite Ltd UK, Hochiki Europe UK, Kingfell Bulgaria and FGC Spain; in undertaking this work and in allowing the project findings to be published. Presented at the 11th International Symposium on Fire Safety Science, Feb 10-14, 2014, New Zealand, Experimental and Survey Studies on the Effectiveness ofMDynamic Signage Systems, EDWIN R GALEA, HUI XIE and PETER J LAWRENCE, Fire Safety Engineering Group,The University of Greenwich,30 Park Row, Greenwich, London SE10 9LS, UK